Category Archives: pargiter

"the linguistic evidence" is magic mantra

Satavahana Brahmi Telugu usage which was supported by Linguistic evidence, linguists themselves are often quite aware that is just a successful theory,
Those who try to take the scientific pretenses of their discipline seriously,Many are willing to be modest and concede that so far it has merely been the most successful hypothesis. In fact, when quizzing linguists about the it, I came away with the impression that they too are not very sure of their case. By now, most of them have been trained entirely within the FIXED framework, which was taken for granted and consequently not sought to be proven anymore. One of them told me that he had never bothered about a linguistic justification , because there was, after all, the well-known archaeological evidence
But for the rest, “the linguistic evidence” is still the magic mantra to silence all doubts about the AIT. At any rate, it is time that we take a look for ourselves at this fabled linguistic evidence.
more details in coming days or call me,,, @ me

Aryan origins,Satavahana Brahmi Telugu spoken regions

The evidence from archaeology and Sanskrit,Brahmi text studies seems to contradict the theory of the entry of the Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-European language family in India through the so-called “Aryan Invasion” Aryan Invasion Theory,, we are usually reassured that “there is of course the linguistic evidence” for this invasion, or at least for the non-Indian origin of the  family.

Thus, F.E. Pargiter had shown how the Puranas locate Aryan origins in the Ganga basin and found “the earliest connexion of the Vedas to be with the eastern region and not with the Punjab”, but then he allowed the unnamed linguistic evidence to overrule his own findings: “We know from the evidence of language that the Aryans entered India very early”.

Aryan origins,Satavahana Brahmi Telugu spoken regions

Here we can easily assume from eastern region the evidence come from the Satavahana Brahmi Telugu usage which was supported by Linguistic evidence as well as spread of civilization from satavahanas to orient egypt etc which was supported by archaeological evidence,and MARITIME TRADE LINKS WITH WORLD CIVILIZATION I THINK.[DAMODHAR RAO MUSHAM] U CAN @ ME OR CALL AT 

+91 09441816605